Lowercase Greek letter LambdaAaron's website

RAW vs JPEG Comparison

Here's a White Pelican at Byxbee Park in Palo Alto, California:

Sony HX99 @ 69.3mm, ISO 80, 1/800, f/6.3

I had the camera set to record both RAW and JPEG, with JPEG quality set to Extra Fine. The above picture is the unmodified JPEG. Let's compare to the RAW image:

RAW left, JPEG right

Although it's only really noticable after zooming, the JPEG (right) shows more noise than the RAW (left), particularly along the bird's lower edge and in shadows.

Anyway, here is a processed version of the RAW photo:

Sony HX99 @ 69.3mm, ISO 80, 1/800, f/6.3

Moving on to my second example, here's an Anna's Hummingbird in Henry Coe State Park, California:

Nikon D3400 + Tamron 150-600mm f/5-6.3 G2 @ 600mm, ISO 100, 1/1000, f/7

The scene was extremely backlit, so the silhouette above is basically what I perceived IRL. That's a JPEG rendering of the unmodified RAW file. By processing the RAW file, we can reveal a lot of color and detail:

I didn't have the camera set to record JPEGs, so in order to make a comparison I converted the unprocessed RAW to a maximum (100)-quality JPEG and tried processing the JPEG:

RAW left, JPEG right

I was surprised by how much color information the JPEG retained, but the processed JPEG still shows flatter colors on the bird's body, chin, and crown.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.